SCANDRETT v DOWLING [1992] NSWCA 221
The Court has jurisdiction to intervene in disputes concerning the government of the Anglican Church, given its Constitution is embodied in an Act of Parliament and affects civil rights. Interim injunctive relief should be granted to preserve the status quo until the main proceedings are heard, as the applicants have an appropriately arguable case and the balance of convenience favours intervention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Scandrett; Respondent: Dowling
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Associations Jurisdiction, Interlocutory Injunctions, Church Government, Sex Discrimination and Ordination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scandrett
Applicant
Dowling
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether courts have jurisdiction to intervene in disputes as to the government of the Anglican Church of Australia
- 2 Whether or not Bishop Dowling could lawfully ordain women as priests absent relevant General Synod legislation
- 3 Whether discrimination legislation applies to ordination of priests
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has jurisdiction to intervene in disputes concerning the government of the Anglican Church, given its Constitution is embodied in an Act of Parliament and affects civil rights. Interim injunctive relief should be granted to preserve the status quo until the main proceedings are heard, as the applicants have an appropriately arguable case and the balance of convenience favours intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Interim injunction granted restraining Bishop Dowling from ordaining women as priests pending determination of main proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment