RAJSKI v SCITEC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS LTD [1988] NSWCA 125
Given the near identity of issues and past judicial involvement, and necessity not requiring participation, both Kirby P and Mahoney JA would withdraw to avoid any reasonable apprehension of bias or predetermination.
- Parties
- Claimant: Leszek Rajski; Respondent: Scitec Communications Systems Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders / Objection to Constitution of the Court; Referral for Relisting
- Outcome
- Summons referred to Registrar for relisting before a differently constituted Court. Costs of the day's proceedings to be costs in the summons.
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Apprehension of Bias, Withdrawal of Judge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leszek Rajski
Claimant
Scitec Communications Systems Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders / Objection to Constitution of the Court; Referral for Relisting
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a judge previously participated in deciding nearly identical issues involving the same parties
- 2 Whether judges who participated in prior similar proceedings should withdraw from hearing the present matter
Ratio Decidendi
Given the near identity of issues and past judicial involvement, and necessity not requiring participation, both Kirby P and Mahoney JA would withdraw to avoid any reasonable apprehension of bias or predetermination.
Court Disposition
Summons referred to Registrar for relisting before a differently constituted Court. Costs of the day's proceedings to be costs in the summons.
Orders
- Summons referred to Registrar to relist before a Court differently constituted.
- Costs of all parties of the proceedings this day to be costs in the summons, including costs of persons who appeared in answer to a subpoena.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment