Scope Data Systems v BDO Nelson Parkhill [2003] NSWSC 137

Scope Data Systems v BDO Nelson Parkhill [2003] NSWSC 137

No genuine dispute exists about a judgment debt merely because an appeal has been lodged or purportedly lodged, nor does a stay of execution (where it applies) make the debt not due and payable. In this case, there was no effective appeal or operative stay, as the purported appeal against the principal judgment was filed out of time and no extension was granted. Accordingly, the statutory demand stands and should not be set aside.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application
Outcome
Originating process dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['winding Up' 'statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'stay of Execution' 'appeals']
['corporations Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['winding Up' 'statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'stay of Execution' 'appeals']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the existence of an appeal and/or a statutory stay of execution gives rise to a genuine dispute as to the existence of a judgment debt under s.459H(1)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether the stay of execution under s.107 of the Justices Act 1902 applies to the Local Court judgment in question' "Whether there is 'some other reason' for setting aside the statutory demand under s.459J(1)(b) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)"]

Ratio Decidendi

No genuine dispute exists about a judgment debt merely because an appeal has been lodged or purportedly lodged, nor does a stay of execution (where it applies) make the debt not due and payable. In this case, there was no effective appeal or operative stay, as the purported appeal against the principal judgment was filed out of time and no extension was granted. Accordingly, the statutory demand stands and should not be set aside.

Court Disposition

Originating process dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Originating process filed on 5 November 2002 is dismissed with costs.']