Peters v Good [2013] NSWDC 278

Peters v Good [2013] NSWDC 278

The defendant made misleading representations to the plaintiffs regarding his investment and ownership in the development, which induced the plaintiffs to invest and resulted in their loss. The plaintiffs are entitled to damages and costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendant
Legal Topics
['investment in Property Development' 'whether Asserted Representations Were Made']
['misleading Conduct'] ['investment in Property Development' 'whether Asserted Representations Were Made']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether defendant made misleading representations to plaintiffs regarding investment in a property development' 'Whether those representations induced the plaintiffs to invest and caused loss']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant made misleading representations to the plaintiffs regarding his investment and ownership in the development, which induced the plaintiffs to invest and resulted in their loss. The plaintiffs are entitled to damages and costs.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendant

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendant in the sum of $484,583.15' "Defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs"]