Harrison v Melhem & Anor (No 1) [2006] NSWSC 1258
Both defendants owed and breached their duty of care to the plaintiff by failing to provide a safe system to lift the trailer arm, and a mechanical lifting method was a reasonable practical alternative; plaintiff was not contributorily negligent and no employer contribution arises under s 151Z as the task was outside employment; plaintiff entitled to damages calculated as set out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Judgment on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff on liability and assessment of damages; matter stood over for orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'vicarious Liability' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'workers Compensation' 'manual Handling Injury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Judgment on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendants were negligent in requiring or allowing the plaintiff to manually lift the trailer arm' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for injuries sustained' 'Whether there should be an apportionment for contributory negligence' 'Whether the employer should contribute under s 151Z Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
Both defendants owed and breached their duty of care to the plaintiff by failing to provide a safe system to lift the trailer arm, and a mechanical lifting method was a reasonable practical alternative; plaintiff was not contributorily negligent and no employer contribution arises under s 151Z as the task was outside employment; plaintiff entitled to damages calculated as set out.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff on liability and assessment of damages; matter stood over for orders.
Orders
- ['The matter is stood over to 29 November 2006 at 9.30 am for orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment