Pascoe v Liprini (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1485

Pascoe v Liprini (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1485

Although Dr Liprini had been unable to persuade solicitors to assist him, there was no immediate prospect that he would be able to obtain solicitors, and the matters raised did not warrant an adjournment; accordingly, good cause for an adjournment was not shown.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Adjournment / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application to Adjourn Hearing
Outcome
Application for adjournment declined.
Legal Topics
['application for Adjournment' 'vexatious Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure'] ['application for Adjournment' 'vexatious Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application for Adjournment / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application to Adjourn Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the hearing should be adjourned on Dr Allan Stephen Liprini's application."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although Dr Liprini had been unable to persuade solicitors to assist him, there was no immediate prospect that he would be able to obtain solicitors, and the matters raised did not warrant an adjournment; accordingly, good cause for an adjournment was not shown.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment declined.

Orders

  • ["Dr Liprini's application for adjournment declined."]