Perrin v SAS Trustee Corporation [2013] NSWDC 191
The plaintiff's incapacity for work outside the police force, arising from certified infirmities, is total, warranting an increase in his superannuation allowance to 85% of his attributed salary as per s 10(1A)(b) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW), effective from 6 September 2007.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Scott David Perrin; Defendant: SAS Trustee Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Superannuation Appeal / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision of defendant set aside. Plaintiff's pension increased to 85%. Defendant to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- Police Superannuation and Pensions, Retirement on Account of Incapacity, Claim for Additional Entitlement, Incapacity for Work Outside the Police Force
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott David Perrin
Plaintiff
SAS Trustee Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Superannuation Appeal / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the applicant's incapacity for work outside the police force?
- 2 Is the plaintiff entitled to an increased superannuation allowance under s 10(1A)(b) or s 10(1A)(c) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW)?
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's incapacity for work outside the police force, arising from certified infirmities, is total, warranting an increase in his superannuation allowance to 85% of his attributed salary as per s 10(1A)(b) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW), effective from 6 September 2007.
Court Disposition
Decision of defendant set aside. Plaintiff's pension increased to 85%. Defendant to pay costs.
Orders
- Set aside the defendant's decision made on 6 September 2007 insofar as the plaintiff's pension entitlements are concerned.
- Plaintiff's pension be increased to 85% (s 10(1A)(b) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW)), to be paid on and from 6 September 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment