Davidson (a pseudonym) v R [2024] NSWCCA 60
The tendency evidence was relevant and admissible, properly admitted, as it showed the applicant's sexual interest in his step-daughter who shared significant features with the complainant, rebuttal of the statutory presumption failed, and directions significantly mitigated unfair prejudice.
- Parties
- Applicant: Scott Davidson (a pseudonym); Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Tendency Evidence, Admissibility, Relevance, Probative Value, Unfair Prejudice, Sexual Offences Against Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott Davidson (a pseudonym)
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether tendency evidence of the applicant's sexual interest was relevant
- 2 Whether sufficient grounds existed to rebut the s 97A(2) presumption of significant probative value of tendency evidence
- 3 Whether the probative value outweighed the danger of unfair prejudice under s 101
Ratio Decidendi
The tendency evidence was relevant and admissible, properly admitted, as it showed the applicant's sexual interest in his step-daughter who shared significant features with the complainant, rebuttal of the statutory presumption failed, and directions significantly mitigated unfair prejudice.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment