R v Buhagiar [2001] NSWCCA 376
Although the sentencing judge erred in the application of the Ellis principle, the seriousness of the offence, including commission while on parole, being in company, deprivation of the victim's liberty and threats, meant that a starting point of about six-and-a-half to seven years was appropriate. After reductions for the guilty plea and the Ellis factor, a sentence of about four years was proper, so the Court should not quash the sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['break, Enter and Steal' 'guilty Plea' 'assistance to Police' 'ellis Discount' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to apply the principle in R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603.' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive even if the Ellis factor had been taken into account.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing judge erred in the application of the Ellis principle, the seriousness of the offence, including commission while on parole, being in company, deprivation of the victim's liberty and threats, meant that a starting point of about six-and-a-half to seven years was appropriate. After reductions for the guilty plea and the Ellis factor, a sentence of about four years was proper, so the Court should not quash the sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment