Scottish & Colonial Ltd v Australian Power & Gas Co Ltd & Ors [2007] NSWSC 1307
As the defendants and cross-claimants succeeded in both the Originating Process and Cross-Claim, and given the circumstances where the plaintiff's claim lost much of its point, the usual order that costs follow the event should be made. There was no sufficient discretionary reason to depart from the ordinary rule.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (costs Decision)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded against the plaintiff and cross defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (costs Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Who should bear the costs of the proceedings on the Originating Process and Further Amended Cross-claim?' "Whether the plaintiff's precipitous commencement of proceedings affects the award of costs"]
Ratio Decidendi
As the defendants and cross-claimants succeeded in both the Originating Process and Cross-Claim, and given the circumstances where the plaintiff's claim lost much of its point, the usual order that costs follow the event should be made. There was no sufficient discretionary reason to depart from the ordinary rule.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded against the plaintiff and cross defendant.
Orders
- ["Order that the plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings on the Originating Process." "Order that the cross defendant pay the cross-claimants' costs of the proceedings on the Further Amended Cross-claim."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment