Scottish Pacific Business Finance Pty Ltd v Qaqour, in the matter of Penny World Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (No 3) [2022] FCA 951
The Court was satisfied on the evidence that there is a strong prima facie case against the new defendants for involvement in an alleged fraudulent scheme, that there is a real risk of dissipation of assets without a freezing order, and that service by ordinary means was impracticable for certain defendants. The balance of convenience required the making of the freezing orders, substituted service, and joinder of the new defendants.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Scottish Pacific Business Finance Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Shadi Qaqour; Second Defendant: Wizly Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Mark Maximos; Fourth Defendant: Omar Jamal Eddine; Fifth Defendant: Penny World Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed); Sixth Defendant: Constructions AU Pty Ltd; Seventh Defendant: AndConstruction Pty Ltd; Eighth Defendant: CCS 136 Castkereagh Pty Ltd; Ninth Defendant: Cindy Kilian (AKA Cindy Kilianova, Finnian Ken); Tenth Defendant: Opal International P Pty Ltd; Eleventh Defendant: D R and MConstruction Pty Ltd; Twelfth Defendant: Malixconstructions Pty Ltd; Thirteenth Defendant: Metro Hubb Pty Ltd; Fourteenth Defendant: Secret Sen Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory, Application for Freezing Orders, Substituted Service, and Joinder of Parties
- Outcome
- Freezing orders, substituted service, and joinder granted as sought (with amendments).
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Substituted Service, Joinder of Parties, Fraudulent Scheme, Debtor Finance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scottish Pacific Business Finance Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Shadi Qaqour
First Defendant
Wizly Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Mark Maximos
Third Defendant
Omar Jamal Eddine
Fourth Defendant
Penny World Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed)
Fifth Defendant
Constructions AU Pty Ltd
Sixth Defendant
AndConstruction Pty Ltd
Seventh Defendant
CCS 136 Castkereagh Pty Ltd
Eighth Defendant
Cindy Kilian (AKA Cindy Kilianova, Finnian Ken)
Ninth Defendant
Opal International P Pty Ltd
Tenth Defendant
D R and MConstruction Pty Ltd
Eleventh Defendant
Malixconstructions Pty Ltd
Twelfth Defendant
Metro Hubb Pty Ltd
Thirteenth Defendant
Secret Sen Pty Ltd
Fourteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory, Application for Freezing Orders, Substituted Service, and Joinder of Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is appropriate to grant freezing orders against the new defendants
- 2 Whether substituted service and service outside the jurisdiction should be ordered
- 3 Whether the new defendants should be joined as parties to the proceeding
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied on the evidence that there is a strong prima facie case against the new defendants for involvement in an alleged fraudulent scheme, that there is a real risk of dissipation of assets without a freezing order, and that service by ordinary means was impracticable for certain defendants. The balance of convenience required the making of the freezing orders, substituted service, and joinder of the new defendants.
Court Disposition
Freezing orders, substituted service, and joinder granted as sought (with amendments).
Orders
- Leave to file and proceed on the interlocutory process granted.
- Dispensation of ordinary service rules for certain documents and parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment