Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 351
The application for permanent injunctions was refused because there was no demonstrated risk or threat of repetition of the defamatory material by the defendants, who had removed the material and indicated no intention to republish. Permanent injunctive relief is not a matter of course in defamation actions and should be granted only when reasonably necessary to address a risk of repetition.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sean Carolan; First Defendant: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Peter FitzSimons
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permanent Injunctions in Defamation Proceedings / Post Judgment Decision on Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Application for permanent injunctions refused
- Legal Topics
- Defamation, Injunctions, Equitable Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sean Carolan
Plaintiff
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Peter FitzSimons
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permanent Injunctions in Defamation Proceedings / Post Judgment Decision on Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant permanent injunctions requiring removal and restraining publication of defamatory material after the plaintiff's success in a defamation case
- 2 Principles applicable to the grant of permanent injunctions in defamation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permanent injunctions was refused because there was no demonstrated risk or threat of repetition of the defamatory material by the defendants, who had removed the material and indicated no intention to republish. Permanent injunctive relief is not a matter of course in defamation actions and should be granted only when reasonably necessary to address a risk of repetition.
Court Disposition
Application for permanent injunctions refused
Orders
- Permanent injunctions sought by the plaintiff are refused; parties to be heard as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment