Cassidy v R [2012] NSWCCA 68
The sentencing judge considered an intention to kill as an element of the offence, thus contravening the De Simoni principle, since intention to kill is an element of a more serious offence (attempted murder) carrying a standard non-parole period, even if the maximum penalty is the same. The appeal is allowed and the sentence recalculated without impermissible consideration of intent to kill.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Sentence / Leave to Appeal Granted; Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'aggravating Circumstances' 'application of De Simoni Principle' 'standard Non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Leave to Appeal Granted; Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge impermissibly took into account a circumstance of aggravation constituting an element of a more serious uncharged offence' "Whether offences with standard non-parole periods are 'more serious' for purposes of De Simoni principle"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge considered an intention to kill as an element of the offence, thus contravening the De Simoni principle, since intention to kill is an element of a more serious offence (attempted murder) carrying a standard non-parole period, even if the maximum penalty is the same. The appeal is allowed and the sentence recalculated without impermissible consideration of intent to kill.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence varied
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal against the sentence.' 'Quash the sentence and non-parole period imposed in the District Court.' 'Sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of nine years with a balance of term of three years to date from 30 September 2009.' 'He will be eligible for release to parole on 29 September 2018.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment