Di Maria v Istanbouli [2013] NSWDC 60
The application to set aside the default judgment was dismissed because the defendants did not appear, provided no adequate explanation for delay, failed to demonstrate an arguable defence, and there was no evidence that adjourning the matter would serve any useful purpose.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application: Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to set aside default judgment dismissed. Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'setting Aside Judgment' 'adjournment of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application: Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to set aside default judgment' 'Whether there was proper service of statement of claim' 'Whether there was an arguable defence' 'Whether delay was adequately explained' 'Whether adjournment would serve any utility']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to set aside the default judgment was dismissed because the defendants did not appear, provided no adequate explanation for delay, failed to demonstrate an arguable defence, and there was no evidence that adjourning the matter would serve any useful purpose.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to set aside default judgment dismissed. Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of the motion.
Orders
- ["First and second defendants' notice of motion to set aside default judgment dismissed." "Order the first and second defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment