Procorp Civil Pty. Ltd. v. Napoli Excavations & Contracting Pty. Ltd. & Ors. (No.2) [2006] NSWCA 147

Procorp Civil Pty. Ltd. v. Napoli Excavations & Contracting Pty. Ltd. & Ors. (No.2) [2006] NSWCA 147

Special circumstances justifying security for costs have been shown due to concerns about Procorp's ability to pay costs, lack of proper accounting evidence, Procorp being in substance a plaintiff in proceedings, and the costly litigation not leading to a final determination of rights; order for $20,000 security for costs made; applications for stay and expedition dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application: Security for Costs; Application for Expedition; Application for Stay
Outcome
Order for security for costs; applications for stay and expedition dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'impecunious Corporation Appellants' 'building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999' 'expedition' 'stay of Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure' 'appeals' 'corporate Law'] ['security for Costs' 'impecunious Corporation Appellants' 'building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999' 'expedition' 'stay of Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application: Security for Costs; Application for Expedition; Application for Stay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether special circumstances justify ordering security for costs against corporate appellant under Part 51 rule 16 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970' 'Whether a corporation challenging adjudication determination under Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is in substance a plaintiff' 'Whether expedition should be granted' 'Disposition of application for stay']

Ratio Decidendi

Special circumstances justifying security for costs have been shown due to concerns about Procorp's ability to pay costs, lack of proper accounting evidence, Procorp being in substance a plaintiff in proceedings, and the costly litigation not leading to a final determination of rights; order for $20,000 security for costs made; applications for stay and expedition dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Order for security for costs; applications for stay and expedition dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Procorp to provide security for costs in the sum of $20,000.00 within 14 days; if not, appeal stayed until provided.' "Procorp to pay Napoli's costs of the application for security for costs." "Procorp's application for stay dismissed; Procorp to pay Napoli's costs." "Procorp's application for expedition dismissed...