YUKSEL v R [2010] NSWCCA 65

YUKSEL v R [2010] NSWCCA 65

The sentencing judge's evaluative process was not vitiated by error, but having found special circumstances, the non-parole period should have been set at less than the statutory 75% ratio to the head sentence. The appropriate non-parole period is five years and ten months, reflecting special circumstances while affirming the original head sentence.

Parties
Appellant: Sedat Yuksel; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 April 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Non Parole Period, Special Circumstances, Vulnerability of Victim
Criminal Law Sentencing Non Parole Period Special Circumstances Vulnerability of Victim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sedat Yuksel

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in determining the offence fell within the middle of the range of objective seriousness
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in finding the applicant was at fault for not undergoing psychiatric treatment
  3. 3 Whether s 21A(3) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act was misapplied

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge's evaluative process was not vitiated by error, but having found special circumstances, the non-parole period should have been set at less than the statutory 75% ratio to the head sentence. The appropriate non-parole period is five years and ten months, reflecting special circumstances while affirming the original head sentence.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Head sentence of nine years imprisonment confirmed
  • Non-parole period of seven years quashed