Seebrad Welding Pty Ltd v Pentair Flow Control Pacific Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1649

It is more appropriate that the proceedings be determined by the Supreme Court of Victoria, together with related proceedings pending there, and justice required the consent orders be made.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 21 November 2014
Procedural Posture: Notice of Motion / Order for Transfer of Proceedings
Outcome: Proceedings transferred to Supreme Court of Victoria; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics: ['transfer of Proceedings' 'cross Vesting' 'workers Compensation Recovery Action']

['procedure'] ['transfer of Proceedings' 'cross Vesting' 'workers Compensation Recovery Action']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Order for Transfer of Proceedings

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether proceedings should be transferred to Supreme Court of Victoria under s 5(2) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

It is more appropriate that the proceedings be determined by the Supreme Court of Victoria, together with related proceedings pending there, and justice required the consent orders be made.

Court Disposition

Proceedings transferred to Supreme Court of Victoria; costs in the cause.

Orders

['Proceedings matter number 2014/199925 be transferred from the Supreme Court of New South Wales to the Supreme Court of Victoria pursuant to section 5(2) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW).' 'The Costs of the motion are costs in the cause.']