Ward, S. & S.P. v Premier Ice Skating Rink Pty Ltd & Ors [1986] FCA 83
The advertisement prepared and authorised by Moser as agent for Premier Ice Skating Rink Pty Ltd was misleading, falsely representing business turnover and overheads. Ward reasonably relied on the advertisement in deciding to purchase. Moser was knowingly concerned in the misleading conduct and is liable for damages under s.82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. Firmin did not have sufficient awareness to establish liability.
- Parties
- Applicant: Selwyn Ward; Applicant: Sharon Patricia Ward; First Respondent: Premier Ice Skating Rink Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Lionel Finkelstein; Third Respondent: William Moser; Fourth Respondent: Desmond Firmin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Practices Claim (misleading or Deceptive Conduct) / Judgment With Damages Declaration and Partial Adjournment
- Outcome
- Declaration of contravention and damages; claim for damages arising from lease obligations adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Business Sale, Damages, Agent Liability, Lease Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Selwyn Ward
Applicant
Sharon Patricia Ward
Applicant
Premier Ice Skating Rink Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Lionel Finkelstein
Second Respondent
William Moser
Third Respondent
Desmond Firmin
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Claim (misleading or Deceptive Conduct) / Judgment With Damages Declaration and Partial Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether advertisement for sale of ice-skating rink was misleading or deceptive under s.52 of Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 Agent liability for misleading conduct
- 3 Damages for misrepresentation (capital loss, acquisition expenses, interest)
Ratio Decidendi
The advertisement prepared and authorised by Moser as agent for Premier Ice Skating Rink Pty Ltd was misleading, falsely representing business turnover and overheads. Ward reasonably relied on the advertisement in deciding to purchase. Moser was knowingly concerned in the misleading conduct and is liable for damages under s.82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. Firmin did not have sufficient awareness to establish liability.
Court Disposition
Declaration of contravention and damages; claim for damages arising from lease obligations adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- Declaration that third respondent (Moser) was directly concerned in first respondent's contravention of s.52 and is liable to pay applicants loss or damages sustained.
- Declaration that liability against fourth respondent (Firmin) is not established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment