Commissioner of Police v Roberts [1987] AFPDT 2
The proven intimidation and denial of legal representation by Senior Constable Roberts constituted a breach of discipline under Regulation 18(1)(d). While the conduct was gravely improper, mitigating factors including frank admission, past compassion, and no evidence of purposeful manipulation justified reduction of salary to the lowest rate for Senior Constable rather than dismissal.
- Parties
- Complainant: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceeding / Decision
- Outcome
- guilty of breach of discipline; penalty imposed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Discipline, Improper Conduct, Intimidation, Denial of Legal Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Police
Complainant
Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceeding / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts committed a breach of discipline by intimidating and denying access to legal representation to a person in custody
- 2 What is the appropriate penalty for the disciplinary offence
Ratio Decidendi
The proven intimidation and denial of legal representation by Senior Constable Roberts constituted a breach of discipline under Regulation 18(1)(d). While the conduct was gravely improper, mitigating factors including frank admission, past compassion, and no evidence of purposeful manipulation justified reduction of salary to the lowest rate for Senior Constable rather than dismissal.
Court Disposition
guilty of breach of discipline; penalty imposed
Orders
- Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts' annual rate of salary is reduced to the lowest annual rate payable to members holding the grade of Senior Constable within the rank of Constable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment