R v MITCHELL, Grant David [2012] NSWSC 694
The offender is sentenced based on sentencing practice for murder offences as at 1987, with allowance for the plea of guilty, remorse, and the unique features of the case. A sentence of 14 years with a non-parole period of 10 years is appropriate to reflect the offender's criminality and the principle of general deterrence.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Grant David Mitchell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentenced to 14 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 years, dating from 9 January 2011.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Murder, Plea of Guilty, Reckless Indifference to Human Life, Domestic Violence, Sentencing Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Grant David Mitchell
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for murder committed with reckless indifference to human life in 1987 in a domestic setting
- 2 Effect of plea of guilty on sentence
- 3 Application of sentencing practice and law at the time of offence
Ratio Decidendi
The offender is sentenced based on sentencing practice for murder offences as at 1987, with allowance for the plea of guilty, remorse, and the unique features of the case. A sentence of 14 years with a non-parole period of 10 years is appropriate to reflect the offender's criminality and the principle of general deterrence.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to 14 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 years, dating from 9 January 2011.
Orders
- Grant David Mitchell is sentenced to 14 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 years, commencing 9 January 2011. He will be eligible for release on parole on 8 January 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment