R v Landini; R v Camilleri [2012] NSWDC 229

R v Landini; R v Camilleri [2012] NSWDC 229

Camilleri's criminality was greater because he was the principal offender and slightly higher in the drug supply hierarchy, while Landini played a lesser but still significant role. The offending was serious, involved multiple supplies of amphetamine and was ended by police intervention, but sentence was moderated by early guilty pleas, remorse, the relatively low purity of the drugs, the fact that the drugs were seized and did not reach end users, age, prospects supported by gaps in offending, and special circumstances. Landini also received a modest reduction for exceptional hardship to his daughter and only limited punishment for the prohibited weapon offence because the prosecution...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Outcome
Both offenders were sentenced to imprisonment. Landini received sentences for possessing a prohibited weapon and knowingly taking part in the supply of a large commercial quantity of amphetamine. Camilleri received a sentence for supplying a large commercial quantity of amphetamine.
Legal Topics
['sentence' 'drug Trafficking' 'possess Prohibited Weapon' 'knowingly Take Part in Supply of Large Commercial Quantity of Amphetamine' 'supply Large Commercial Quantity of Amphetamine' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence' 'drug Trafficking' 'possess Prohibited Weapon' 'knowingly Take Part in Supply of Large Commercial Quantity of Amphetamine' 'supply Large Commercial Quantity of Amphetamine' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentences should be imposed on Henry Charles Landini for possessing a prohibited weapon and knowingly taking part in the supply of a large commercial quantity of amphetamine.' 'What sentence should be imposed on Victor John Camilleri for supplying a large commercial quantity of amphetamine.' "How the offenders' different roles in the drug supply hierarchy affected relative criminality." 'What allowance should be made for guilty pleas, remorse, age, rehabilitation prospects, family hardship, drug purity, police seizure of the drugs and special circumstances.']

Ratio Decidendi

Camilleri's criminality was greater because he was the principal offender and slightly higher in the drug supply hierarchy, while Landini played a lesser but still significant role. The offending was serious, involved multiple supplies of amphetamine and was ended by police intervention, but sentence was moderated by early guilty pleas, remorse, the relatively low purity of the drugs, the fact that the drugs were seized and did not reach end users, age, prospects supported by gaps in offending, and special circumstances. Landini also received a modest reduction for exceptional hardship to his daughter and only limited punishment for the prohibited weapon offence because the prosecution...

Court Disposition

Both offenders were sentenced to imprisonment. Landini received sentences for possessing a prohibited weapon and knowingly taking part in the supply of a large commercial quantity of amphetamine. Camilleri received a sentence for supplying a large commercial quantity of amphetamine.

Orders

  • ['For Henry Charles Landini, for possessing a prohibited weapon: non-parole period of one year with a head sentence of two years, to date from 8 December 2010.' 'For Henry Charles Landini, for knowingly taking part in the supply of a large commercial quantity of amphetamine: non-parole period of four and a half...