R v HENG [2012] NSWDC 58
The offender's armed robbery was very serious because he threatened a train passenger with a knife in broad daylight to obtain money for drugs. Although he was young, pleaded guilty early, showed remorse and had some prospects if he addressed drug use, the seriousness of the offence, Form 1 matters, breach of two s 9 bonds, personal deterrence, general deterrence and denunciation required imprisonment. To avoid double counting while recognising the bond breaches, the sentence was made partially cumulative and partially concurrent with Local Court sentences, with special circumstances found.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- The offender was sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 2 years and a head sentence of 3 and a half years.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'armed Robbery' 'form 1 Offences' 'breach of S 9 Bonds' 'parity' 'general Deterrence' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the armed robbery committed with a knife on a train, taking into account the offender's early guilty plea, youth, remorse, drug use, rehabilitation prospects, parity with a juvenile co-offender, Form 1 matters, and breach of two s 9 bonds." 'Whether the sentence should be partially cumulative and partially concurrent with Local Court sentences imposed for offences committed in breach of bonds.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's armed robbery was very serious because he threatened a train passenger with a knife in broad daylight to obtain money for drugs. Although he was young, pleaded guilty early, showed remorse and had some prospects if he addressed drug use, the seriousness of the offence, Form 1 matters, breach of two s 9 bonds, personal deterrence, general deterrence and denunciation required imprisonment. To avoid double counting while recognising the bond breaches, the sentence was made partially cumulative and partially concurrent with Local Court sentences, with special circumstances found.
Court Disposition
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 2 years and a head sentence of 3 and a half years.
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment.' 'A non-parole period of 2 years is set to date from 6 December 2011.' 'A head sentence of 3 and a half years is imposed.' 'The non-parole period will expire on 5 December 2013, on which day the offender is eligible to be released to parole.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment