Regina v Jang [1999] NSWSC 1153
Although the crimes involved deliberate killings and little mitigation, the level of culpability was not so extreme as to mandate a life sentence under s 431B(1) of the Crimes Act. Determinate sentences were imposed, taking into account the prisoner’s age, lack of prior convictions, and guilty pleas.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- prisoner sentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment for murder
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for two counts of murder' 'Application of Crimes Act mandatory life sentence provisions' "Evaluation of mitigation factors and 'special circumstances'"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the crimes involved deliberate killings and little mitigation, the level of culpability was not so extreme as to mandate a life sentence under s 431B(1) of the Crimes Act. Determinate sentences were imposed, taking into account the prisoner’s age, lack of prior convictions, and guilty pleas.
Court Disposition
prisoner sentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment for murder
Orders
- ['Soo Duck Jang is sentenced for each conviction to a minimum term of 18 years penal servitude, commencing 8 April 1998 and expiring 7 April 2016.' 'An additional term of 6 years is specified in each case, commencing 8 April 2016 and expiring 7 April 2022.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment