R v Grant DURRINGTON; R v Matthew John CORBY [2008] NSWDC 362
Despite the seriousness of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug, the low objective seriousness of the offences, absence of aggravating factors, early guilty pleas, lack of criminal history, and strong prospects for rehabilitation justify the imposition of s 9 good behaviour bonds instead of sentences of imprisonment for both accused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Good behaviour bond for period of 3 years for both accused under s 9 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'knowingly Taking Part in Supply of Prohibited Drug' 'good Behaviour Bond']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for each accused who pleaded guilty to knowingly taking part in supply of a prohibited drug under s 25(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985?']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the seriousness of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug, the low objective seriousness of the offences, absence of aggravating factors, early guilty pleas, lack of criminal history, and strong prospects for rehabilitation justify the imposition of s 9 good behaviour bonds instead of sentences of imprisonment for both accused.
Court Disposition
Good behaviour bond for period of 3 years for both accused under s 9 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Orders
- ['Matthew John Corby to enter into a good behaviour bond for a period of three years with conditions: remain of good behaviour, appear before the court if called upon, notify the court of any change of residential address.' 'Grant Durrington to enter into a good behaviour bond for a period of three years with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment