R v Hraichie (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 319

R v Hraichie (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 319

The risk of misuse and further propagation of material supporting violent jihad and extremist propaganda, and the potential for both pro-terrorist and anti-Muslim groups to use such material to incite violence, significantly outweighs the public interest in open justice. Therefore, non-publication orders are necessary.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Hearing
Outcome
non-publication orders granted
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'terrorism Offences']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'terrorism Offences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether non-publication orders should be made concerning specific evidence tendered at the sentencing hearing']

Ratio Decidendi

The risk of misuse and further propagation of material supporting violent jihad and extremist propaganda, and the potential for both pro-terrorist and anti-Muslim groups to use such material to incite violence, significantly outweighs the public interest in open justice. Therefore, non-publication orders are necessary.

Court Disposition

non-publication orders granted

Orders

  • ["The audio-visual recording of the Offender's interview with the Australian Federal Police on 14 September 2016 is not to be published." "The transcript of the audio-visual recording of the Offender's interview with the Australian Federal Police on 14 September 2016 is not to be published." 'The annexures labelled...