R v Haines (No.3) [2016] NSWSC 1812
The seriousness of the offender’s conduct, including breach of trust, vulnerability of victims, absence of mitigating subjective factors, and deliberate criminality, warranted an aggregate sentence significantly above the mid-range for two murders, but did not justify the maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The aggregate sentence approach ensures proportional recognition of the two lives taken and avoids total concurrence, applying principles of totality and denunciation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'murder' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'objective Seriousness' 'parole Eligibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Sentencing for two counts of murder' 'Assessment of objective seriousness' 'Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors' 'Appropriateness of aggregate sentence' 'Eligibility for parole']
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offender’s conduct, including breach of trust, vulnerability of victims, absence of mitigating subjective factors, and deliberate criminality, warranted an aggregate sentence significantly above the mid-range for two murders, but did not justify the maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The aggregate sentence approach ensures proportional recognition of the two lives taken and avoids total concurrence, applying principles of totality and denunciation.
Court Disposition
Sentence imposed
Orders
- ['For the two offences of murder, impose an aggregate sentence comprising a non-parole period of imprisonment of 27 years commencing on 7 July 2014 and concluding on 6 July 2041, with a balance of term of 9 years commencing on 7 July 2041 and concluding on 6 July 2050.' 'Warn the offender of the operation of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment