R v Hammond [2019] NSWDC 844
The sentence must reflect both the objective seriousness of the armed robbery and robbery, the breach of parole, and the offender's individual circumstances, moderated in light of background and mental health, with leniency applied to avoid disproportional aggregate sentencing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of six years with a non-parole period of three years; parole period of three years.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'armed Robbery' 'robbery' 'aggregate Sentence' 'parole' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for armed robbery and robbery' 'Effect of guilty pleas on sentence' 'Application of guideline judgments to sentencing' 'Effect of offending while on parole' 'Application of the totality principle' "Consideration of offender's background and mental health"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence must reflect both the objective seriousness of the armed robbery and robbery, the breach of parole, and the offender's individual circumstances, moderated in light of background and mental health, with leniency applied to avoid disproportional aggregate sentencing.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of six years with a non-parole period of three years; parole period of three years.
Orders
- ["Aggregate sentence of six years' imprisonment commencing 14 June 2018." 'Non-parole period of three years.' 'Parole period of three years.' 'Eligible for consideration for release to parole on 13 June 2021.' "Mr Borenstein's report attached to warrant; recommendation for immediate Justice Health psychiatric...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment