R v Jolic [2022] NSWDC 284
Given the offender's guilty pleas, low objective seriousness of the cultivation charges, mitigating factors including remorse, good character, absence of prior convictions, and special circumstances due to first time in custody and COVID-19 hardships, the appropriate sentence is 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 months, to be served in full-time custody as the offender will be deported and not eligible for an ICO.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'cultivation of Prohibited Plants' 'dealing With Proceeds of Crime']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for two counts of cultivating prohibited plants by enhanced indoor means in commercial quantities?' 'How should a Form 1 charge of dealing with proceeds of crime affect sentencing?' 'Are there mitigating factors to be considered in sentencing?' 'Does objective seriousness of the offence fall below mid-range?' 'Should special circumstances be found for parole?' 'Should sentence be served in full-time custody versus ICO?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's guilty pleas, low objective seriousness of the cultivation charges, mitigating factors including remorse, good character, absence of prior convictions, and special circumstances due to first time in custody and COVID-19 hardships, the appropriate sentence is 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 months, to be served in full-time custody as the offender will be deported and not eligible for an ICO.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Convicted of two counts of cultivating a commercial quantity of prohibited plants by enhanced indoor means in contravention of section 23(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.' 'Head Sentence of 3 years imprisonment with Non-Parole Period of 18 months, backdated to 17 February 2021.' 'Released on parole...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment