R v Nguyen [2024] NSWDC 273

R v Nguyen [2024] NSWDC 273

The objective seriousness of the offending was very high due to the offender's key role in providing premises, facilitating sophisticated indoor cultivation of large quantities of cannabis, and knowingly concealing involvement with false documents. His conduct crossed the s 5(1) custodial threshold for all counts, and deterrence, punishment, and community protection required substantial imprisonment, moderated only by his subjective circumstances, remorse, and prospect of rehabilitation. Aggregate sentence reflects partial concurrency consistent with the totality principle.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
offender sentenced to aggregate term of imprisonment
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'drug Cultivation' 'perverting the Course of Justice' 'assistance to Authorities' 'hardship to Family']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'drug Cultivation' 'perverting the Course of Justice' 'assistance to Authorities' 'hardship to Family']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Sentencing for accessorial involvement in commercial drug cultivation' 'Sentencing for perversion of the course of justice' 'Consideration of subjective circumstances and hardship to family' 'Assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors' 'Application of discounts for guilty plea and assistance to authorities' 'Application of totality and concurrency principles in sentence aggregation']

Ratio Decidendi

The objective seriousness of the offending was very high due to the offender's key role in providing premises, facilitating sophisticated indoor cultivation of large quantities of cannabis, and knowingly concealing involvement with false documents. His conduct crossed the s 5(1) custodial threshold for all counts, and deterrence, punishment, and community protection required substantial imprisonment, moderated only by his subjective circumstances, remorse, and prospect of rehabilitation. Aggregate sentence reflects partial concurrency consistent with the totality principle.

Court Disposition

offender sentenced to aggregate term of imprisonment

Orders

  • ['Offender convicted of counts 1, 2, and 3.' "Sentenced to 5 years and 6 months' imprisonment commencing 4 June 2024, expiring 3 December 2029." 'Non-parole period of 3 years expiring 3 June 2027.' 'Corrective Services directed to provide care, assessment and assistance as expeditiously as possible in custody.']