R v Amante [2019] NSWDC 222
The offender intentionally damaged property by fire in a domestic violence context, aggravating factors included breach of AVO and being on bail. The offender's dysfunctional upbringing and mental health/substance abuse issues reduced moral culpability. Special circumstances justified a longer parole period. A full-time custodial sentence of 3 years 9 months with a non-parole period of 2 years was appropriate after a 25 per cent discount for a guilty plea.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'intentionally Damage Property by Fire' 'domestic Violence' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for intentionally damaging property by fire in a domestic violence context under s195(1)(b) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender intentionally damaged property by fire in a domestic violence context, aggravating factors included breach of AVO and being on bail. The offender's dysfunctional upbringing and mental health/substance abuse issues reduced moral culpability. Special circumstances justified a longer parole period. A full-time custodial sentence of 3 years 9 months with a non-parole period of 2 years was appropriate after a 25 per cent discount for a guilty plea.
Court Disposition
Imprisonment
Orders
- ['Offender is sentenced to full-time imprisonment for 3 years and 9 months, commencing 4 October 2018.' 'Non-parole period is fixed at 2 years to expire on 3 October 2020.' 'Parole period is 1 year 9 months from 4 October 2020.' 'Non-publication order of the name of the victim.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment