R v Gardiner [2017] NSWDC 409
Given Mr Gardiner's failure to comply with court orders and subsequent offending, a custodial sentence with a non-parole period of 18 months and a head sentence of three years is appropriate. Special circumstances are found to encourage rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Jake Gardiner
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Sentence Hearing and Pronouncement
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 months and a head sentence of 3 years. Finding of special circumstances.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Enter Dwelling House With Intent to Commit Larceny, Failure to Attend ICO Assessment, Totality, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Jake Gardiner
Offender
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Sentence Hearing and Pronouncement
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for entering dwelling house with intent to commit larceny
- 2 Effect of failure to attend intensive correction order (ICO) assessment
- 3 Application of the totality principle and special circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Given Mr Gardiner's failure to comply with court orders and subsequent offending, a custodial sentence with a non-parole period of 18 months and a head sentence of three years is appropriate. Special circumstances are found to encourage rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 months and a head sentence of 3 years. Finding of special circumstances.
Orders
- Mr Gardiner sentenced to 3 years imprisonment dated from 17 February 2017.
- Non-parole period of 18 months expiring 16 August 2018, with release to parole on that date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment