R (Cth) v Wang; R (Cth) v Lin [2013] NSWDC 167

R (Cth) v Wang; R (Cth) v Lin [2013] NSWDC 167

Given the seriousness of importing a marketable quantity of methamphetamine and the need for general deterrence, offenders importing for financial gain, with roles as couriers or recruiters, must be sentenced severely. While their guilty pleas, lack of prior record, and some personal circumstances warrant mitigation, particularly for early pleas and cooperation, the paramount sentencing factor remains general deterrence. Wang, having recruited Lin, bears greater criminal responsibility and thus a higher sentence than Lin, a mere courier.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Offender: Hung Pin Wang; Offender: Chun Chou Lin
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted. Wang sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment (non-parole 4 years 6 months); Lin sentenced to 6 years imprisonment (non-parole 4 years). Recommendation that both be deported to the People's Republic of China upon release.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Importation of Border Controlled Drugs, Marketable Quantity, Methamphetamine, General Deterrence, Role of Offender
Criminal Law Sentencing Importation of Border Controlled Drugs Marketable Quantity Methamphetamine General Deterrence Role of Offender

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina (Crown)

Prosecution

Hung Pin Wang

Offender

Chun Chou Lin

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for importation of a marketable quantity of methamphetamine contrary to s 307.2(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)?
  2. 2 To what extent do the roles of the offenders and their personal circumstances affect sentencing?
  3. 3 What is the role of general deterrence in sentencing for drug importation?

Ratio Decidendi

Given the seriousness of importing a marketable quantity of methamphetamine and the need for general deterrence, offenders importing for financial gain, with roles as couriers or recruiters, must be sentenced severely. While their guilty pleas, lack of prior record, and some personal circumstances warrant mitigation, particularly for early pleas and cooperation, the paramount sentencing factor remains general deterrence. Wang, having recruited Lin, bears greater criminal responsibility and thus a higher sentence than Lin, a mere courier.

Court Disposition

Convicted. Wang sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment (non-parole 4 years 6 months); Lin sentenced to 6 years imprisonment (non-parole 4 years). Recommendation that both be deported to the People's Republic of China upon release.

Orders

  • Hung Pin Wang sentenced to imprisonment for 6 years and 9 months, commencing on 10 November 2012; non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months.
  • Chun Chou Lin sentenced to imprisonment for 6 years, commencing on 10 November 2012; non-parole period of 4 years.