R v Shahudin [2021] NSWDC 163
Given the offender’s low-level involvement, plea of guilty, remorse, good character, cooperation, and significant time already spent in custody, a conditional release order without passing sentence was appropriate under s 20(1)(a) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Offender: Mohammad Shahudin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conditional release order without passing sentence
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Federal Offences, Mitigating Factors, Recognisance, Circumstances of Offence, Co Offenders, Deterrence, Purposes of Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Mohammad Shahudin
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for offence under s 308‑125 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)
- 2 Consideration of mitigating factors including guilty plea, remorse, good character, and likelihood of re-offending
- 3 Assessment of objective seriousness and need for deterrence given excise forgone
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender’s low-level involvement, plea of guilty, remorse, good character, cooperation, and significant time already spent in custody, a conditional release order without passing sentence was appropriate under s 20(1)(a) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).
Court Disposition
conditional release order without passing sentence
Orders
- The offender is convicted of the offence.
- Conditional release pursuant to s 20(1)(a) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), subject to entering into a recognisance, self, in the sum of $100.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment