R v Ilic [2019] NSWDC 885
Given the vulnerability of the victim, the nature of the armed robbery, the offender's background and demonstrated remorse, and the principles of general deterrence and totality, a sentence of three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year and six months was appropriate, reflecting both retribution and the prospects for rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Offender: Daniel Ilic; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year and six months.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Armed Robbery, General Deterrence, Special Circumstances, Totality, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Plea of Guilty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Ilic
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for armed robbery involving a vulnerable victim
- 2 Application and moderation of the Henry guideline
- 3 Relevance of offender's background and remorse to sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Given the vulnerability of the victim, the nature of the armed robbery, the offender's background and demonstrated remorse, and the principles of general deterrence and totality, a sentence of three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year and six months was appropriate, reflecting both retribution and the prospects for rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment with a non-parole period of one year and six months.
Orders
- Conviction entered.
- Sentence commences on 14 November 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment