R v Tunde Doja [2008] NSWDC 69
The offender was sentenced to terms of imprisonment on multiple counts of obtaining financial advantage by deception, reflecting the serious nature of the offences, the abuse of a position of trust, the need for deterrence, and the harm to victims, with cumulative and concurrent sentences structured having regard to totality and special circumstances.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Crown; Offender: Tunde Doja
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Trial and Conviction
- Outcome
- offender sentenced to full-time imprisonment with specified non-parole and total terms
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecutor
Tunde Doja
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Trial and Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for offences of obtaining financial advantage by deception while acting as an unlicensed financial advisor
- 2 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating circumstances under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- 3 Application of principles of totality, special circumstances, and abuse of position of trust
Ratio Decidendi
The offender was sentenced to terms of imprisonment on multiple counts of obtaining financial advantage by deception, reflecting the serious nature of the offences, the abuse of a position of trust, the need for deterrence, and the harm to victims, with cumulative and concurrent sentences structured having regard to totality and special circumstances.
Court Disposition
offender sentenced to full-time imprisonment with specified non-parole and total terms
Orders
- On counts 7-12: imprisonment with non-parole period of 2 years, total term of 4 years, commencing at specified staggered dates for each count.
- On counts 13-14: imprisonment with non-parole period of 18 months, total term of 3 years, concurrent terms, non-parole period commencing 1 May 2010 and expiring 31 October 2011, total term expiring 30 April 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment