R v Walkerden [2019] NSWDC 881
The appropriate sentence for the offender, having regard to his intellectual disability, absence of further offending in the 20 years since the crimes, evidence of remorse and rehabilitation, and the significant subjective hardship of custody, is a three-year aggregate sentence with a substantial finding of special circumstances and a 15% reduction for the early plea. The historic nature of the offences and the contemporary sentencing practices inform, but do not dictate, the sentencing discretion, and the objective seriousness is tempered by the offender’s limitation and the passage of time.
- Parties
- Offender: Michael Walkerden; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- offender sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Sexual Abuse, Intellectual Disability in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Walkerden
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is an appropriate sentence for historic indecent assault and sexual intercourse with a child committed by an intellectually disabled offender?
- 2 How should the offender's intellectual disability and time elapsed since offence affect the sentence?
- 3 What weight should be given to guilty plea and demonstrated rehabilitation?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence for the offender, having regard to his intellectual disability, absence of further offending in the 20 years since the crimes, evidence of remorse and rehabilitation, and the significant subjective hardship of custody, is a three-year aggregate sentence with a substantial finding of special circumstances and a 15% reduction for the early plea. The historic nature of the offences and the contemporary sentencing practices inform, but do not dictate, the sentencing discretion, and the objective seriousness is tempered by the offender’s limitation and the passage of time.
Court Disposition
offender sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment, commencing 7 November 2019.
- Non-parole period of one year and six months, expiry 6 May 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment