R v Poulimenos [2025] NSWDC 35
The offender participated as part of a joint criminal enterprise involving detention, violence, and threats for financial advantage. Despite less prominent involvement and mitigating circumstances including drug use and personal disadvantage, full-time imprisonment was warranted owing to the seriousness of the offence, its duration, violence used, and prior criminal history. Sentence is adjusted for special circumstances and remand.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Panagiota Poulimenos (aka Pam Ford)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentence
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Detain for Advantage in Company
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Panagiota Poulimenos (aka Pam Ford)
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of appropriate sentence for detaining for advantage in company contrary to s.86(2)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
- 2 Assessment of seriousness of offence
- 3 Consideration of offender's moral culpability and mitigating circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The offender participated as part of a joint criminal enterprise involving detention, violence, and threats for financial advantage. Despite less prominent involvement and mitigating circumstances including drug use and personal disadvantage, full-time imprisonment was warranted owing to the seriousness of the offence, its duration, violence used, and prior criminal history. Sentence is adjusted for special circumstances and remand.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentence
Orders
- Offender convicted.
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment of 2 years and 7 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment