R v AM [2024] NSWDC 546
The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for multiple offences of sexual and domestic violence against his partner, including consideration of objective seriousness, mental health issues reducing moral culpability (Bugmy and De La Rosa principles), and a finding of special circumstances to ensure meaningful rehabilitation through extended supervision.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: AM
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offending, Domestic Violence, Assault, Firearms Offence, Contravention of Apprehended Domestic Violence Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
AM
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for multiple sexual and violent offences against a partner
- 2 Impact of mental health issues (Bugmy issues) on moral culpability and sentencing
- 3 Assessment of objective seriousness for domestic violence offences
Ratio Decidendi
The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for multiple offences of sexual and domestic violence against his partner, including consideration of objective seriousness, mental health issues reducing moral culpability (Bugmy and De La Rosa principles), and a finding of special circumstances to ensure meaningful rehabilitation through extended supervision.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The offender is convicted on each count.
- Aggregate sentence of 6 years 3 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years 2 months and balance of term of 2 years 1 month.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment