R v Aras Giotas [2007] NSWDC 37
The sentence imposed on the first trial did not reflect the level of criminality and the evidence before the court after the re-trial, including the offender's testimony and the circumstances of the offence. The independent assessment of criminality and the objectives of sentencing warrant a longer sentence than was previously imposed; specific reasons are provided as required by law.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: R; Offender: Aras Giotas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Re Trial
- Outcome
- Offender convicted on each count; sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count, concurrent, with three years and four months non-parole period; parole conditions imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Sexual Assault, Re Trial, Increase of Sentence After Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecutor
Aras Giotas
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Re Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence after re-trial should be greater than the sentence imposed at the first trial
- 2 Assessment of objective and subjective seriousness of the offence
- 3 Identification and application of aggravating and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed on the first trial did not reflect the level of criminality and the evidence before the court after the re-trial, including the offender's testimony and the circumstances of the offence. The independent assessment of criminality and the objectives of sentencing warrant a longer sentence than was previously imposed; specific reasons are provided as required by law.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted on each count; sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count, concurrent, with three years and four months non-parole period; parole conditions imposed.
Orders
- Offender is convicted on each count.
- On each count, sentenced to five years imprisonment commencing 23 February 2006, expiring 22 February 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment