In the matter of Bigdeal Artist Management Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2015] NSWSC 936
Leave was granted because SEQ advanced a proprietary claim to monies held by a company in liquidation and that claim had a solid foundation. Clause 2.4 of the CAMA created an express trust over the collected gross receipts until distribution in accordance with the parties' entitlements. The variation made by SEQ and the Company gave SEQ priority to the Deferred Fees, and the payment to the Company's liquidators was not a distribution in accordance with those entitlements. The trust therefore did not terminate upon that payment, and the liquidators received the trust funds as volunteers and remained bound by the trust. SEQ was entitled to payment from the First and Second Defendants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Process Seeking Leave Under S 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and Proprietary Trust Relief Against a Company in Liquidation / Final Determination of Application in the Equity Division Corporations List
- Outcome
- SEQ's claim succeeded; leave was granted nunc pro tunc and the First and Second Defendants were ordered to pay SEQ $168,349.14, with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Commence and Maintain Proceedings Against Company in Voluntary Liquidation' 'proprietary Claim' 'express Trust' 'distribution of Trust Property' 'tracing Trust Property Into Hands of Volunteer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Originating Process Seeking Leave Under S 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and Proprietary Trust Relief Against a Company in Liquidation / Final Determination of Application in the Equity Division Corporations List
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for SEQ to commence and maintain proceedings against Bigdeal Artist Management Pty Limited (in liquidation).' 'Whether monies held by Investec under the Collection Account Management Agreement were held on trust for the relevant parties, including SEQ.' 'Whether the variation made by SEQ and the Company entitled SEQ to payment of the Deferred Fees in priority to other post-event expenses.' 'Whether the trust terminated when Investec paid monies to the liquidators of the Company.' 'Whether the liquidators received the relevant trust funds as volunteers and were bound by the trust.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was granted because SEQ advanced a proprietary claim to monies held by a company in liquidation and that claim had a solid foundation. Clause 2.4 of the CAMA created an express trust over the collected gross receipts until distribution in accordance with the parties' entitlements. The variation made by SEQ and the Company gave SEQ priority to the Deferred Fees, and the payment to the Company's liquidators was not a distribution in accordance with those entitlements. The trust therefore did not terminate upon that payment, and the liquidators received the trust funds as volunteers and remained bound by the trust. SEQ was entitled to payment from the First and Second Defendants.
Court Disposition
SEQ's claim succeeded; leave was granted nunc pro tunc and the First and Second Defendants were ordered to pay SEQ $168,349.14, with no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Leave be granted pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), nunc pro tunc, for the plaintiff to commence and maintain these proceedings against Bigdeal Artist Management Pty Limited (ACN 003 657 387) (in liquidation).' 'The First Defendant and the Second Defendants (in their capacity as liquidators...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment