Goldberg, Re C.A. Law Society of NSW, Ex parte The [1988] FCA 301
A debt owing to the Law Society under s.65Q(2) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1898 (NSW) for expenses paid to a receiver is a liquidated sum due at law and is sufficient to support a bankruptcy petition without the need for prior judgment.
- Parties
- Debtor: Charles Alroy Goldberg; Petitioning Creditor: The Law Society of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment of Petition
- Outcome
- Further hearing adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Receiver's Fees, Legal Practitioners Act Debt Recovery, Affidavit of Solvency, Court's Directions on Affidavits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Alroy Goldberg
Debtor
The Law Society of New South Wales
Petitioning Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment of Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fees paid by the Law Society to a receiver under the Legal Practitioners Act 1898 (NSW) constitute a debt for the purposes of a bankruptcy petition.
- 2 Whether judgment is required before such fees can be relied upon as a debt in bankruptcy proceedings.
- 3 Whether the debtor may rely on an affidavit of solvency not filed in accordance with Court directions.
Ratio Decidendi
A debt owing to the Law Society under s.65Q(2) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1898 (NSW) for expenses paid to a receiver is a liquidated sum due at law and is sufficient to support a bankruptcy petition without the need for prior judgment.
Court Disposition
Further hearing adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- The further hearing of the petition be adjourned until 24 June 1988 at 9.30 am.
- Costs be reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment