Re Hayes, Charles Raymond Ex parte The Bankrupt [1983] FCA 259
Because the applicant was already bankrupt under a Queensland sequestration order made on 16 December, 1976, the later New South Wales sequestration order made on 28 April, 1977 ought not to have been made. There were no special circumstances justifying departure from the general rule applied in Re White and Re Coles, and annulment was the proper relief under s.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application by the Bankrupt for Annulment of a Sequestration Order Under S.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966
- Outcome
- The bankruptcy was annulled.
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' 'annulment of Bankruptcy' 'second Sequestration Order' 'automatic Discharge From Bankruptcy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application by the Bankrupt for Annulment of a Sequestration Order Under S.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sequestration order made in New South Wales on 28 April, 1977 ought not to have been made because an earlier sequestration order had already been made against the applicant in Queensland on 16 December, 1976.' 'Whether the bankruptcy should be annulled under s.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicant was already bankrupt under a Queensland sequestration order made on 16 December, 1976, the later New South Wales sequestration order made on 28 April, 1977 ought not to have been made. There were no special circumstances justifying departure from the general rule applied in Re White and Re Coles, and annulment was the proper relief under s.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966.
Court Disposition
The bankruptcy was annulled.
Orders
- ['The sequestration order made against Charles Raymond Hayes on 28 April, 1977 be annulled pursuant to s.154 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966, as amended.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment