De Ferro, Re H. Hosie, Ex Parte B. & Anor [1986] FCA 217
The bankruptcy notice was not invalid because it followed the final terms of the judgment as entered. The existence of a pending and unprosecuted civil claim by the debtor did not justify refusal of the sequestration order, as no substantive evidence of its merit was provided.
- Parties
- Debtor: Helen de Ferro; Petitioning Creditor: Bruce Hosie; Petitioning Creditor: Rosalie Hosie
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Sequestration Order Application
- Outcome
- Sequestration order made (operation suspended for 21 days)
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Bankruptcy Notice Validity, Judgment Debt, Discretion to Make Sequestration Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen de Ferro
Debtor
Bruce Hosie
Petitioning Creditor
Rosalie Hosie
Petitioning Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Sequestration Order Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bankruptcy notice is invalid if it understates the correct amount due under judgment
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise discretion not to make a sequestration order due to pending litigation between the debtor and creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The bankruptcy notice was not invalid because it followed the final terms of the judgment as entered. The existence of a pending and unprosecuted civil claim by the debtor did not justify refusal of the sequestration order, as no substantive evidence of its merit was provided.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order made (operation suspended for 21 days)
Orders
- Sequestration order made against the estate of Helen de Ferro, operation suspended up to and including 25 June 1986
- Costs (including reserved costs) to be taxed and paid according to the Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment