Re Burgess, W.F. & Anor v. Ex parte Octagon Enterprises Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 271

Re Burgess, W.F. & Anor v. Ex parte Octagon Enterprises Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 271

The court found there were no substantial reasons based on the evidence to question the existence or truth of the debt, and the judgment debtors failed to provide sufficient proof to justify going behind the judgment debt. Therefore, the court will not re-examine the existence of the debt and will proceed to make a sequestration order.

Parties
Judgment Debtor: William Frederick Burgess; Judgment Debtor: Gail Mignion Burgess; Petitioning Creditor: Octagon Enterprises Pty. Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 1987
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition for Sequestration Order / Hearing of Notice of Intention to Oppose
Outcome
Sequestration order proposed to be made; formal making delayed to allow debtors to consider their position.
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Going Behind Judgment, Notice of Intention to Oppose, Judgment Debt
Bankruptcy Sequestration Order Going Behind Judgment Notice of Intention to Oppose Judgment Debt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Frederick Burgess

Judgment Debtor

Gail Mignion Burgess

Judgment Debtor

Octagon Enterprises Pty. Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Petitioning Creditor

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition for Sequestration Order / Hearing of Notice of Intention to Oppose

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the court give leave to go behind the judgment debt on which the creditor's petition is founded?
  2. 2 Is there evidence that the judgment debt is not truly due or that the accounts were inaccurate?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found there were no substantial reasons based on the evidence to question the existence or truth of the debt, and the judgment debtors failed to provide sufficient proof to justify going behind the judgment debt. Therefore, the court will not re-examine the existence of the debt and will proceed to make a sequestration order.

Court Disposition

Sequestration order proposed to be made; formal making delayed to allow debtors to consider their position.

Orders

  • Sequestration order against the estates of William Frederick Burgess and Gail Mignion Burgess (formal order delayed).