SERHAN v SERHAN [1996] NSWCA 470
The respondent failed to comply with the mandatory obligations under s48(3) of the Motor Accidents Act 1988 to provide particulars of economic loss, and no reasonable excuse for this non-compliance was made out; therefore, the proceedings could not be validly commenced and the statement of claim must be struck out.
- Parties
- Appellant: Serhan; Respondent: Serhan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal (and, If Leave Granted, Appeal) / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Leave and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave granted; appeal upheld; statement of claim struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicle Accidents, Duties of Co Operation, Provision of Particulars, Compliance With Statutory Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Serhan
Appellant
Serhan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (and, If Leave Granted, Appeal) / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Leave and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent provided sufficient information to the insurer to comply with s48(3) of the Motor Accidents Act 1988
- 2 Whether there was a reasonable excuse for the respondent's failure to comply with the request for particulars of economic loss
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to comply with the mandatory obligations under s48(3) of the Motor Accidents Act 1988 to provide particulars of economic loss, and no reasonable excuse for this non-compliance was made out; therefore, the proceedings could not be validly commenced and the statement of claim must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Leave granted; appeal upheld; statement of claim struck out.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment