McIntyre v O’Regan [2015] NSWSC 1985

McIntyre v O’Regan [2015] NSWSC 1985

The deceased's will made provision for her children in amounts within the lower end of the adequate range, factoring in their circumstances and needs. The court determined that adequate provision had been made under the will, and redesigning the will for fairness would not respect the reasonable judgment of the testator.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Sarah McIntyre; Second Plaintiff: Seth McIntyre; Defendant: Serryn O'Regan
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Family Provision, Wills and Estates, Testamentary Freedom
Succession Law Equity Family Provision Wills and Estates Testamentary Freedom

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarah McIntyre

First Plaintiff

Seth McIntyre

Second Plaintiff

Serryn O'Regan

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether adequate provision was made for adult children under the deceased's will
  2. 2 Whether further provision should be ordered from the estate

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased's will made provision for her children in amounts within the lower end of the adequate range, factoring in their circumstances and needs. The court determined that adequate provision had been made under the will, and redesigning the will for fairness would not respect the reasonable judgment of the testator.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claims dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiffs' claims to be dismissed
  • Court will hear parties as to precise orders and costs