R v BASHFORD [2000] NSWCCA 426
The sentencing judge erred by denying the applicant the benefit of a divided term with parole, as the principle of parity did not strictly apply due to the differing sentencing regimes and personal circumstances. The Court varied the order to fix a non-parole period to promote rehabilitation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to fix a non-parole period.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'parity of Sentences' 'control Orders' 'non Parole Period' 'rehabilitation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Did the sentencing judge apply wrong principles regarding parity between applicant and co-offender?' 'Should the applicant have received a fixed term or a divided term with non-parole period?' 'Was the fixed term excessive given pre-sentence custody and the applicant’s juvenile status?']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by denying the applicant the benefit of a divided term with parole, as the principle of parity did not strictly apply due to the differing sentencing regimes and personal circumstances. The Court varied the order to fix a non-parole period to promote rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied to fix a non-parole period.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal and allow the appeal.' 'Vary the sentencing order by fixing a non-parole period of nine months commencing 18 January 2000 and expiring 17 October 2000.' 'Applicant eligible for release on parole on 17 October 2000.' 'Non-parole period fixed at less than three-quarters of the control order...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment