MARGARITIS v AGC (ADVANCES) PTY LTD [1991] NSWCA 190
The Court concluded the appeal procedure was inappropriate to set aside the consent orders and deed of settlement. Such relief should be sought by way of fresh proceedings, not appeal. Leave to appeal was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr and Mrs Margaritis; Claimant: Attika Investments Pty Ltd; Claimant: Attika Property Management Pty Ltd; Opponent: AGC (Advances) Ltd; Opponent: Westpac Banking Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Consent Orders, Deed of Settlement, Discovery, Non Disclosure, Appeal Procedure, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs Margaritis
Claimant
Attika Investments Pty Ltd
Claimant
Attika Property Management Pty Ltd
Claimant
AGC (Advances) Ltd
Opponent
Westpac Banking Corporation
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to set aside consent orders and deed of settlement due to alleged non-disclosure in discovery
- 2 Whether appeal procedure is appropriate or whether fresh proceedings should be commenced to set aside consent orders
Ratio Decidendi
The Court concluded the appeal procedure was inappropriate to set aside the consent orders and deed of settlement. Such relief should be sought by way of fresh proceedings, not appeal. Leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment