SZDMO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1304
The applicant's absence from the original hearing was excusable, giving the Court jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte order; however, there was no substantive basis identified for granting leave to appeal and the original orders should stand except no further order for costs today.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Orders/appeal / Application to Set Aside Earlier Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed; no order as to costs on the motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['setting Aside Ex Parte Orders' 'leave to Appeal' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Orders/appeal / Application to Set Aside Earlier Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the ex parte orders made in the applicant's absence should be set aside" 'Whether leave to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's absence from the original hearing was excusable, giving the Court jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte order; however, there was no substantive basis identified for granting leave to appeal and the original orders should stand except no further order for costs today.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed; no order as to costs on the motion.
Orders
- ['The motion, notice of which was filed on 17 July 2006, be dismissed.' 'No order as to costs on that motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment