R v Woods; R v Cheong [2018] NSWSC 123
The evidence necessary to prove the commission of the murder by Fantakis is also necessary to prove the charges of accessory after the fact against Woods and Cheong. The dramatic and prejudicial evidence is admissible and not impermissible, as it is part of the proof required for the accessories. Any potential prejudice can be cured by proper jury directions, and the interests of justice favour a joint trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Severance of Indictment Before Trial
- Outcome
- Notices of Motion seeking severance dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['severance of Trial' 'accessory After Murder' 'joint Trials' 'prejudice in Joint Trials']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Severance of Indictment Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial of Woods and Cheong should be severed from that of Fantakis due to alleged incurable prejudice arising from joint trial.' 'Whether evidence admissible against Fantakis is prejudicial and inadmissible against Woods and Cheong.' 'Whether the prejudice can be cured by proper jury directions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence necessary to prove the commission of the murder by Fantakis is also necessary to prove the charges of accessory after the fact against Woods and Cheong. The dramatic and prejudicial evidence is admissible and not impermissible, as it is part of the proof required for the accessories. Any potential prejudice can be cured by proper jury directions, and the interests of justice favour a joint trial.
Court Disposition
Notices of Motion seeking severance dismissed.
Orders
- ['The Notices of Motion seeking severance of the indictment are dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment